When Paranormal Activity 3 was released, I remember seeing that it was a prequel to the first two movies, and thinking that I would have much preferred “the hunt for Katie,” something that came after the events of Paranormal Activity 2. I imagined it almost as a [Rec2] style film, about a swat team hunting down the demon (after all, didn’t technically the footage from the first film get found?).

Well…you know what they say…be careful what you wish for. Paranormal Activity 4 takes place some years after the events of PA2 and features not so much “the hunt for Katie,” as it does “Katie the demon kills a family, steals their baby, and then raises him in suburbia.”

Maybe I’m jumping ahead too much. Paranormal Activity 4 features a new family, and focuses primarily on oldest daughter Alex. Her adopted brother Wyatt has befriended their neighbor’s young son, Robbie, and when Robbie’s mom gets into an accident, Robbie comes to live with Alex and her family. That’s when creepy things start happening, and when Wyatt starts going by the name “Hunter,” the threads of the first 3 movies start poking through, and we get the usual assortment of bumps in the night, cabinets opening and closing, and the like.

What I will say is that, probably in anticipation of an audience expecting the filmmakers to “up the ante,” PA4 does get a little more vicious. I believe it probably has the highest body count of the series and the demon has moved from wearing a blanket to look like a ghost (in PA3) to lifting up knives and trying to drop them on unsuspecting victims. There are a couple of new things in PA4, but the problem is that they’re just really new ways of telling the same story as the first couple of films. Read the rest of this entry »

Written on January 30th, 2013 , Horror, Movies & TV

Ya know, a lot can be said about a weekend where you watch Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter one night, then follow it up with Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters the next. That’s not to say either film is bad. Quite the opposite – actually, both films were pretty enjoyable fare that I probably don’t ever need to see again. Still, they both have multiple things in common, primarily the fact that both are campy film concepts that involve visually stellar directors, involve hunting some kind of monster, and take themselves too seriously.

If there’s one negative thing I’ll say about Buffy the Vampire Slayer, it’s that it set the stage for all future vampires/werewolves/witches/monsters to know some sort of martial arts. Ever since Buffy hits the airwaves, it seems that, if a hunter/slayer knows martial arts, then so does every monster they hunt, even though monsters really shouldn’t need to. I mean, if I had the power of 10 men, would I really need to learn jeet kune do? I’m thinking no.

Still, with a film called Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters, you kind of have to leave such questions at the door before you walk in. From the director of Dead Snow, you know you really aren’t in for a serious take on the classic fairy tale. And I am a sucker for a dark fairy tale story. Now that fairy tales are big, we’re getting hit with them from all over the place. Snow White and the Huntsman, the TV shows “Grimm” and “Once Upon A Time,” and now Witch Hunters.

Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters begins with an alternate take on the original fairy tale we know. Hansel and Gretel are left in the woods by their parents for reasons unknown, and they come across a witch’s house made out of candy. Well, we know how this one goes – they defeat the witch (with one very important alteration for the movie) and, instead of living happily ever after, grow up to be famed witch hunters, travelling the world and killing evil witches…for a fee. When they come across a village where 11 children have been taken by witches, they investigate and come across a coven of witches trying to perform a ceremony that will allow them to be immortal.

Pretty standard fare, honestly. Despite the fun concept, the story isn’t anything terribly original or innovative and, as sad as I am to say it (I really enjoyed Dead Snow), the direction really isn’t anything all that spectacular either. Gemma Arterton does a great job as Gretel, and Jeremy Renner…well, he’s Jeremy Renner. Am I the only one who remembers him as being charismatic in 28 Weeks Later? When did he turn into the new Sam Worthington? Do these guys ever smile anymore?

Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters is odd in that even though it’s predictable (you know what’s coming WAY before the big reveal near the end), and has nothing special to speak of, it’s got a charm that makes it enjoyable. Peter Stormare is in it, basically playing the same role he did in Brothers Grimm, but in a better film. There’s also a certain joy in the fact that, though there’s plenty of CG, there’s also a good amount of practical effects and makeup, which I was grateful for. Derek Mears (Jason in Freddy vs Jason) plays a troll named Edward in the film, and I can’t begin to tell you how much more enjoyable his presence was for me knowing that it wasn’t a CG character.

So really, there’s not much negative to say about Hansel and Gretel – fans of this type of film should check it out. If you think the concept is stupid, seeing the film isn’t likely to change your mind. The worst thing I have to say about the film is that it’s not exceptional. It’s fun bubble gum fare and, if you see it in 3D, you get a whole lot of guts and arrows flying at you through the screen. While I wish it would inject a bit more humor (other than the concept and the fact that everyone’s a damn ninja in martial arts), there’s still plenty to keep you smiling about the film, even if you’re not likely to remember much about it a couple of days after.

Awesomeness score – 6/10

Written on January 27th, 2013 , Fantasy, Horror, Movies & TV

It’s that special time of year when the leaves change and a boy’s thoughts turn to reanimating the dead.  In honor of Halloween and the return of fresh episodes of The Walking Dead, your friends at Ideology of Madness are giving away the first eight trades of Robert Kirkman’s THE WALKING DEAD to one lucky winner!

The Deets:

One winner chosen at random will receive volumes one through eight of  THE WALKING DEAD.

Two ways to win!

1. All you have to do to enter is tell us in the comments what what your costume was on your very first Halloween to dress-up; and/or

2. Call us on the Funnybooks hotline (972-763-5903) and tell us abut your zombie apocalypse survival plan (responses may be played on a future episode of Funnybooks).

One entry per person per entry type, please.

Items will only be shipped within the United States. You must be 18 years or older to win.

Contest ends Friday, October 26 at 11:59 pm Central time. Winners will be announced on the Funnybooks with Aron and Paulie episode releasing on Monday, October 29th.

It’s been five years since children the world over turned on their parents, devouring their nurturers.

They are predators our children. Cunning. Deadly.

It’s been five years since the dead started walking.

AND A LITTLE CHILD SHALL EAT THEM is an actual play recording made at Fear the Con 5. This is the FIFTH installment of the game in the original setting played annually at Fear the Con using the All Flesh Must Be Eaten system.

Your game master is Aron from FUNNYBOOKS WITH ARON AND PAULIE.

Around the table this time are Tim and Andrew from Ideology of Madness’ Funnybooks with Aron and Paulie. John from Thistledown AP dot com as well as wade, Chris, Hannah and Tresi from the Internet are present for this chapter in a world gone mad for the sweet, warm screaming flesh of man..

Year 4 of And a Little Child Shall Eat Them can be heard here.

Over the weekend, I had the opportunity to go see Prometheus in Imax 3D.  It was a friend’s birthday, and this was his choice of celebratory entertainment.  I had seen previews for the movie previously but had not been aware of the controversy of whether or not this was an alien prequel.  The trailers had made it rather obvious that this was, at minimum a prequel to Alien if not a retelling of that story with access to modern movie-making technology.

This was my first exposure to Imax 3D and I have to say that I was impressed.  I have seen other movies presented in the standard realdD 3D, and for the most part it has not really looked any better.  Those movies also suffered in my estimation as I would get a headache from watching the movie through two sets of glasses.  This was not the case with Imax 3D.  I didn’t get a headache just from the effect itself, though the two pairs of eye glasses was still annoying.  It also added to the spectacle of an already visual engrossing movie.  I will have to admit that if friends want to see a 3D movie again I will strongly suggest seeing it in Imax 3D.

My thoughts on the movie itself are quite mixed.  It is visually stunning and I would expect nothing less from Ridley Scott.  The opening sequences were gorgeous.  We are treated to a majestic alien vista where we are shown how the Engineers work their magic of creation.  This segues smoothly into a trip across a landscape that appears alien but is revealed to be an isolated island in Scotland in the future.  The ship design was interesting as well despite the obvious resemblance to Firefly.  The visual impact of the movie is felt from the beauty of these alien expanses to the visceral body horror that occurs later in the film.

My problems with the movie arises from the behavior of the supposed scientists on this expedition.  The opening sequence I mention above is where  the discovery of the Engineer’s planet is made and sets the expedition into motion.  After a long interstellar journey, the group is awakened and prepped for their descent planet side.  The impression that is given by the introduction of each character is that it is more of a mercenary band with a few scientists mixed in but this is not the case.  As the story unfolds, it is revealed that outside of the captain and his crew, almost all of the other players are a scientist of one stripe or another.   This group of scientists, exploring a unknown world with a toxic atmosphere have few compunctions about removing their helmets upon discovering a structure with a breathable atmosphere.

This is the point at which I wanted to call bullshit.  The problem was that this would make the rest of the movie, at most tedious and I didn’t want to spend this time being annoyed.  I had to take a different perspective.  In order to better enjoy the movie, I watched it as if it were a Burning Wheel game.  Instead of trying to be scientists, each character was trying to fulfill their own personal beliefs with varying degrees of success.  This made the movie more enjoyable as I spent the rest of the movie trying to decide what beliefs David was pursuing.  Whereas the other characters beliefs were obvious, Fassbender’s portrayal of David shows a depth of purpose that is lacking in the others.

This is not to say that this perspective made everything enjoyable.  There are points in the movie where nothing truly makes sense.  The scene where the two scientist who have gotten trapped in the alien edifice because they got lost is a prime example.  They have left the group due to not being scientists that deal with biology or archaeology and are confronted with an alien life form that looks suspiciously like a penis.  Instead of running in fear, this is the perfect time for these two scientist to become xenobiologists.  In case you may be wondering, it doesn’t end well.

As an aside, when faced with an alien that looks like a penis the only option should be run.  Just sayin’

In the end, the movie is enjoyable but flawed.  It tries to deal with big themes and forgets that the characters need to be invested in these to communicate them in a believable fashion.  The characters are treated as sock-puppets to deliver the plot as opposed to agents in which the audience can invest.  If you are going to spend the money to see this movie now, I recommend seeing it in Imax 3D.  Otherwise, wait for the cheap theater.

Written on June 13th, 2012 , Horror, Movies & TV, Science Fiction
  • Kevin Smith’s Comic Book Men
  • AMC’s The Walking Dead
  • Bendis on X-Men
  •  AvX Program Guide
  • Avengers Academy #26
  • Secret Avengers #23
  • No Place Like Home #1
  • Fantastic Four #603
  • Ultimate Comics All New Spider-Man #7
  • Marvel Heroic Roleplaying

Give us a call at 972-763-5903 and leave us your thoughts on the Third Annual Funnies. If we use your voicemail, you’ll win an Ideology of Madness SurPrize.

It boggles my mind that there are websites that will give the recent The Thing prequel a negative review for repeating the beats of the John Carpenter original, but will give Paranormal Activity 3 a positive review.  Now don’t get me wrong, Paranormal 3 brings a good amount of scares and jumps, and is mostly successful, but the movie rips off everything from the old BBC TV movie Ghostwatch (worth seeking out) to Poltergeist, Halloween:The Curse of Michael Myers, and even the first two movies in the franchise.

The thing about PA3 is that it’s largely effective as a scary movie.  Until the last fifteen minutes, the film actually does a good job of racketing up tension and throwing a good jump scare at you every couple of minutes.  The problems with the movie actually don’t come from the acting or the scares, but from the very basics of the story and the direction.  It’s hard to go into too many details without spoiling things, so let’s talk a bit more after the jump, shall we?

Remember…SPOILERS AFTER THE JUMP!

Read the rest of this entry »

Written on October 22nd, 2011 , Horror, Movies & TV Tags: ,

Remember “Paul’s Horror Flix?” It’s been a while since I’ve reviewed any horror films for the site, and I kinda miss talking about films in my favorite genre, especially with Pauloween coming up in just a month and a half (as long time readers know, Pauloween is a month-long event, not just October 31st!).  Well, it’s about damn time we brought the tradition of chatting about our favorite scary flicks back to IoM, starting each Friday with FEARFUL FRIDAYS (check out previous horror reviews here).

First off, Grave Encounters, a “found footage” horror movie due out October 18th on DVD. In the movie, a group of paranormal investigators, similar to television’s popular Ghost Hunters or Ghost Adventures shows, investigates a haunted hospital. Though the site housed some pretty tragic events when filled with the living, since it’s been abandoned, folks have been seeing eerie apparitions and hearing odd noises. As we’re told, this is the sixth episode of the aborted “Grave Encounters” tv series, and gathered from the raw footage filmed during their visit there.

Full review after the jump. Read the rest of this entry »

Written on August 19th, 2011 , Horror, Movies & TV Tags:

I have a confession to make.

I didn’t like “The Walking Dead” anywhere near as much as everyone else seems to have. I mean, it was a good series, but I felt it dragged, and got unnecessarily repetitive … not good for only 6 episodes. Still, it’s strength (I felt) came from series showrunner Frank Darabont, who also directed the awesome pilot. Well….

This is a quite a bombshell — I have learned that Frank Darabont, the creator, executive producer and director of AMC’s smash hit The Walking Dead, is stepping down as showrunner of the series, which is now in production on its upcoming second season. The news is even more surprising given the fact that Darabont was on hand for Walking Dead’s Comic-Con panel just this past Friday alongside fellow executive producers Robert Kirkman, on whose graphic novel the series is based, and Gale Anne Hurd and appeared excited about Season 2. There is speculation that Darabont might be off the show completely, but I hear talks are still ongoing about him possibly staying on in some capacity. Darabont, who spent five years trying to get a TV version of the zombie saga off the ground and wrote and directed the AMC pilot, hails from the feature world, and I hear that he never quite adjusted to the daily grind of producing a TV series. (more at Deadline)

That’s very curious, really. I’d imagine he’ll stay on in some capacity, as Frank seems to be really into the series. I mean, at one time he fired the entire writing staff in favor of taking more control over the writing. I think Darabont probably just wants to get back into feature directing, and a series just doesn’t allow for that kind of time. I’d expect to see him in a producing job on the series when it finally drops this October.

What say you? Does this give you fears about “Walking Dead” season 2?

Written on July 27th, 2011 , Horror, Movies & TV, Television

Well, technically the first official trailer for the upcoming prequel/reboot to The Thing.  I love the original.  It’s in my top 5 horror films of ALL TIME.  The way they are approaching this new film … it’s impressive.  They hired a pretty girl/guy lead combo, but aren’t making the film (at least from the trailer) all about skin, like The Texas Chainsaw Massacre did (though I enjoyed the hell out of that one).  Not only that, they seem to have successfully tried to capture the essence of the time period of the original, save for one glaringly obvious CGI shot in the trailer (you’ll see it).  Damn, I can’t wait.

Video: ‘The Thing’ Movie Trailer

Written on July 14th, 2011 , Horror, Movies & TV Tags:

Ideology of Madness is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Ideology of Madness

If we geek about it, we speak about it.